Showing posts with label Estate planning lawyer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Estate planning lawyer. Show all posts

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Choosing Non-relatives over Relatives as Your Beneficiaries?

Summary: When you decide to create a legacy that favors non-relatives over relatives, there are several possible risks involved. One is that your relatives will decide to challenge your plans in court. Another is that, depending on how you go about making your distributions, you could create possibly harmful tax implications for your estate and your beneficiaries. Proper estate planning may be able to help you minimize or avoid some or all of these risks. Your estate planning attorney can help show you what techniques will best serve your objectives. 

Calvin was a single man living in Colorado. Near the end of his life, one of the primary things on Calvin’s mind was who would own his home after he died. Eventually, Calvin decided to sign a deed that gave the property to three of his closest friends. When Calvin died, he had no estate plan -- no living trust and no will. This meant that Calvin‘s estate would pass according to Colorado’s intestacy laws.

Colorado’s intestate succession rules, like most states, seek to distribute assets to the closest living relatives of the deceased person. Calvin had no living spouse or children. In fact, his closest living relative (under the standards of the intestacy laws) was his half-sister. This was true because the statute only looks at levels of kinship, not personal relationships. In real life, Calvin and his half-sister were far from close. They last spoke at their father’s funeral, which took place more than 20 years before Calvin died. Nevertheless, the half-sister asked the probate to name her as the personal representative of Calvin’s estate, and the court granted the request.

After becoming the personal representative, the half-sister sued to invalidate the deed Calvin executed transferring his house. The deed was executed before Calvin died, meaning that the house was not part of his intestate estate. However, if the court wiped out the deed, then the ownership would revert back to his estate and would go to his sole legal heir, the half-sister.

Ultimately, the friends prevailed in the courts. The trial court stated that the half-sister’s case was “groundless” and backed up by a “dearth of evidence.”

In this case, the deceased man’s estate planning goals were upheld. His planning, as limited as it was, involved getting his home into the hands of his three friends, which was what happened in the end. Whether Calvin had executed a deed a few months before his death, or a will a few months before his death, the legal standard would have been the same: did he or did he not have testamentary capacity when he signed the document?

Nevertheless, Calvin’s approach was still less than ideal. Simply giving his home to his friends by signing a deed meant that the friends lost the possibility to receive the “stepped up basis” in the home. This loss could be costly if they chose to sell the property, as it would likely mean that they would owe a much greater amount of capital gains taxes. Additionally, simply deeding over the home could also have potentially negative gift tax implications, as well. Had Calvin merely executed a will or a living trust that directed his trust or estate to transfer the home to the three friends, Calvin could have achieved the same goal without same degree of potentially harmful tax implications.

         

This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com

This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan



Monday, May 22, 2017

Working with the Right Team of Professionals to Help You Plan Your Estate

Summary: Picking a service provider for estate planning assistance is often very similar to picking other service providers, whether that’s a repairman, doctor, lawyer or broker. The key is not to be fearful because some in the industry are unethical or incompetent; unfortunately, there are unethical and/or incompetent providers in any professional industry. By simply checking out your provider carefully before you pick them, and making certain you’re working with a reputable team, you can benefit from the many significant rewards that a reliable provider can offer you. 

Back in the 1990s, a young man in his late 20s, who believed he was having an allergic reaction to over-the-counter medicine, went to his physician for a diagnosis. The doctor asked the man to remove his shirt. After viewing the man and the “rash” that covered his chest, back, arms and face (and the rest of his body,) the doctor told him that he, indeed, had a drug reaction, to cease taking over-the-counter cold/allergy medications and to “tough it out like the rest of us do.” The mother of the man’s best friend, who was a nurse, diagnosed the man differently, needing only one phone call to do so. “It’s not a drug allergy. It’s chicken pox,” the nurse said, after hearing a verbal description of the “rash.” It was, in fact, chicken pox.

In recent days, several news outlets released reports regarding a Florida teen who has been arrested and charged with criminal offenses for pretending to be a doctor in Virginia.

What do these two stories have to do with estate planning? Perhaps more than you’d think. Would you say that all doctors are to be avoided or that the business of practicing medicine is a “scam” just because this teen (and various other men and women – including some licensed physicians) have engaged in fraud, or because some doctors are so horribly bad at their jobs that they cannot diagnose an obvious case of chicken pox? Chances are that you would not. Would you say that all lawyers are useless or that the business of law practice is a scam just because some attorneys are unethical and others are incompetent? Hopefully you wouldn’t.

The same can be said when it comes to people in the business of providing services related to helping you plan your estate. Without question, there are some people offering such services that are not very good at what they do. And there are others purporting to offer such assistance who are undeniably operating scams. But those facts do not mean that everybody in the business of providing these services is a dangerous scam-artist who should be avoided. Yet, many times, you might read or hear that you must avoid all companies that provide estate planning assistance simply because some in the industry are unethical, corrupt or incompetent.   

The key, when it comes to analyzing services providers who offer estate planning assistance, is, much like selecting any type of service provider, simply to make sure that you’re working with the RIGHT provider. First and arguably foremost, ask yourself if your provider’s service gives you access to an estate planning attorney who is an independent professional experienced in the law of estate planning, who will independently represent your interests and provide you with a unique estate plan specifically customized to your needs and goals? If your provider is a reliable one, the answer will be “yes.” This is an essential part of any reliable service.        

If you choose carefully, you can have the peace of mind that comes with knowing that you have a single destination, and a single team of experienced professionals well-acquainted with you and your objectives, where you can turn to whenever you need assistance. If you do your “homework” and choose cautiously, just as you would do in choosing a doctor, lawyer, stockbroker or insurance agent, you can reap the rewards of having an entire team, and the resources that come with it, on your side.    

This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com


This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan




         

Monday, April 10, 2017

Using 'Joint Tenancy With Right of Survivorship' Accounts as Part of Your Estate Plan



Summary: There are many techniques that can help you avoid the potential costs and delays of probate. Just because all of these techniques can be entirely effective at avoiding probate does not, however, mean that they are all equal. With some of these techniques, the benefits of probate avoidance come with a downside of greater risks -- risks that your planning goals may be stymied, or that your plan could end up requiring costly and time-consuming court litigation to sort out.   

Joint tenancy with right of survivorship (JTWROS) accounts, as well as pay-on-death or transfer-on-death accounts, can be wonderfully useful tools in some situations. Sometimes, they can be a helpful part of your overall estate planning. In certain circumstances, they can be a simple and low-maintenance way ensure that your assets pass to your desired beneficiaries without the hassles, costs and delays of probate administration. However, in many other situations, they can be risky way to try to avoid probate. They can potentially put your wealth in jeopardy if the person you've added to your account decides to use the account funds for his own purposes, rather than your goals. Alternately, even if the person you've added to your account is above reproach, your assets could still be at risk if that person divorces or is successfully sued by someone. What's more, they ca also pose the potential of requiring expensive and stressful court litigation in order to get your wealth to the beneficiaries that you wanted to have it.

Take, for example, a case decided by the courts in September 2016. The case involved the estate of man named John, who was a senior in declining health in the final years of his life. He had both a checking account and a savings account. He had several people listed on his checking account as authorized signors. They included, in addition to John, his daughter, a grandson and the grandson's wife. On the savings account, authorized signors included John, the daughter and the grandson's wife.  

The problems arose shortly after John died. First, the grandson withdrew $22,000 from John's checking account. The grandson's wife then withdrew nearly $26,000 from John's savings account. This sum of almost $48,000 represented roughly 50% of the total amount in the two accounts combined. The couple claimed that they were entitled to the money because the accounts were joint accounts with right of survivorship. In an account that is truly a JTWROS, all of the "tenants," or owners of the account, have equal claims to the account's assets in the event of the death of the account holders.

In John's case, the problem that led to the court battle was a lack of clarity. If the account truly was a JTWROS asset, then the grandson and his wife had the legal right to withdraw the funds that they withdrew for whatever purposes they wanted. However, John's daughter, who was acting on behalf of John's estate, claimed that the grandson and wife were not joint tenants; they were only added to John's accounts as signatories as a convenience to John. Ultimately, the courts sided with the daughter. The trial court ruled that the grandson and wife didn't have any evidence to show that John intended for the money in his checking and savings to pass to the daughter, grandson and grandson's wife as a JTWROS account would. If the outcome reached by the courts was not what John intended, then at least some of the objectives of his estate plan were frustrated. Even if the outcome did reflect John's goals for the money in his checking and savings, which appears to have been more likely, it still took an expensive and time-consuming court battle to achieve this end.     

Careful planning can potentially help you avoid an unfavorable situation like what happened with this man's estate. There are ways to create a plan that will take the guesswork out of your planning goals. One example is a revocable living trust, which can allow you to dictate, with great specificity, exactly what you want to achieve with regard to each of your assets and each of your beneficiaries. In addition to this, it can also benefit you by avoiding probate while at the same time sidestepping some of the risks involved with other probate-avoidance techniques like JTWROS accounts.    

This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com

This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan




Friday, January 6, 2017

Excluding Children From Your Estate Plan | How to Go About -- and Not Go About it!

Summary: The reasons a person might choose to leave a child nothing as part of their estate plan are as varied as the people who make these decisions. However, regardless of the specific factors leading up to them, these decisions are often very personal and often the result of careful thought. If you are in this situation, it is essential that you promptly establish an estate plan and make sure that you have well-thought out documents to memorialize your objectives. It is important to ensure that your estate planning documents are written in such a way that they will be able to carry out these goals and not get defeated by legal pitfalls.

A very recent case, and another one a few years old, deal with a potentially tricky, but also very important issue, which is the very wide degree of control each person has regarding who will, and who will not, receive their wealth when they die. Sometimes the reasons a parent makes this decision is financial. Perhaps a child is very rich in comparison to her siblings, leaving the parents to conclude that the siblings need that wealth more than their rich sister. Or, in the alternative, perhaps a child has struggled financially during the parents' lifetimes and the parents have supported that child with gifts of wealth that they did not give to their other children, leaving the parents to distribute their estate among the children who did receive assistance during their lifetimes.

Other times, though, the reasons are not about financial issues, but are more personal. This occurred in Illinois a few years ago where four of Max and Erla Feinberg's five grandchildren, who each had received nothing, challenged their grandparents' estate plan. The four challengers argued that they were excluded because they chose to marry non-Jewish spouses and that such an estate plan violated Illinois law. In a very recent New Jersey case, the scenario was reversed. A daughter, who was the sole surviving heir of her parents, challenged the will of her father that left his entire estate to various religious charities. She claimed that her Catholic parents disinherited her because she chose to date (and later marry) a Jewish man.

In both cases, the estate plan contests failed. In each case, the precise wording of the estate planning documents was key to the courts' decisions to reject the contests. It is important to understand that the law significantly limits what's called "dead hand" control, which is an attempt to dictate the future behavior of your beneficiaries. If the parents or grandparents' estate plans had made inheritance or disinheritance explicitly contingent upon a beneficiary's decision to marry (or not to marry) a person of a particular faith, the challenges might have succeeded. Because the plans were precisely  worded to avoid such statements, the legal challenges did not succeed. The Illinois court concluded that the the Jewish grandparents' plan did not disinherit the four grandchildren for marrying non-Jewish people. The documents' wording indicated that the grandparents merely rewarded the one grandchild who "embraced the values" that the grandparents cherished. In the New Jersey case, the Catholic father's will was enforceable because it explicitly stated that he disinherited his daughter due to her alleged selfishness, manipulation, cruelty, abusiveness and vindictiveness, making no mention of the son-in-law or his religion.

For a lot of people, their personal reasons for disinheriting their children may be simpler. For example, a child may fail to continue maintaining a relationship with the parents. Regardless of the reason, both the Illinois and the New Jersey case highlight the importance of well-thought out plan documents. The daughter in the New Jersey case lost her contest because the father's will stated reasons for his decision that were unrelated to the son-in-law's religion so, in that case, the inclusion of language explaining the father's reasoning helped defeat the contest. In other cases, however, including too much explanation regarding your reasoning for disinheriting a close relative may actually provide added avenues of attack for your plan challenger. The key is to include exactly the right amount, and right type, of explanatory language. With the help of a knowledgeable estate planning attorney, you can craft a plan that honors all of your goals and objectives while minimizing the risk of a successful challenge by a disgruntled relative.   

 This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com

This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan


Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Estate Planning | Don't Delay, Plan Today... To Keep Your Estate in Order


Summary: Whether it is your marriage, your health, your car, your home, your boat or your estate plan, all of these have some things in common. One of them is that all of the hard work you put into acquiring and building these things up end up being lost if you allow them to fall into disrepair due to neglect. With regard to your estate plan, one of the best ways to avoid this state of disrepair is through regular maintenance. By resisting the urge to put off periodic estate plan reviews, you be certain that you have a plan best suited to carry out your wishes and your goals, and reflect both the state of personal affairs in your life and the state of the laws where you live. 

When it comes to estate planning, it can be easy to procrastinate. There are dozens of different reasons people put off getting an estate plan in place. For those that clear this hurdle and get a complete plan put together and executed, this is not the end of the process. Many people know that they need to be pro-active in ensuring that their plan remains up-to-date. However, just like making an initial estate plan, maintaining an estate plan can be easy to put off. And just as with initial estate planning, it is imperative not to fall into this procrastination trap. 

Procrastinating the completion of your estate plan maintenance essentially creates a minefield of possible harms that can blow up all the careful planning you've done. One of these mines is a change in your personal situation. Life events that can cause this include divorce, marriage, a birth or a death, among others. A man in Virginia ended up leaving his ex-wife (instead of his current wife) a $124,558 death benefit payout from his life insurance because he did not do proper estate plan maintenance and, specifically, did not update the death beneficiary form on his life insurance after he divorced the previous wife and later married the subsequent one.

Another potential problem possibly awaiting your estate plan is a change in your state's laws. If, for example, you have a former spouse whom (unlike the man in Virginia mentioned above) you do wish to include in your legacy, and you have not updated your plan since before your divorce, your goals could be thwarted. Some (but not all) states have statutes saying that a divorce automatically invalidates any estate plan provision created to benefit the now ex-spouse. If your state didn't have such a law but then decided to create a new statute and adopt such a provision, then this person to whom you made a conscious and intentional decision to leave a distribution could end up getting nothing as a result of your plan not being updated to address this legal change.

Your estate plan "check-up" can serve other goals, too. It can allow you and your team of estate planning professionals to contemplate many questions, like whether a change in your amount of wealth might warrant additional planning steps, such as the additional of additional trust(s)... or whether you still have sufficient resources to pay for your final expenses and the other costs of carrying out your final wishes. 

Whether taking inventory of your assets, taking inventory of the changes in personal life or taking inventory of the changes in the law, your estate plan review can give you the confidence that you have a plan in place that is optimized to deal with circumstances as they exist now, not as they existed when you signed your original set of plan documents. 



Friday, November 18, 2016

Creating an Estate Plan | Don't Delay, Get Your Estate in Order

Summary: Most everyone considers themselves very busy with their day-to-day lives. Whether it is work or family or something else, chances are you have something (or some things) in your life that keep you daily schedules filled up. In the crush of addressing daily responsibilities, it can be easy to lose sight of things that may not seem like immediate priorities. Estate planning can be one of those things, making it easy to put off. Don't fall into this procrastination trap. Failing to take the steps necessary to get a plan in place is a serious risk and this gamble can proven extremely costly to you and your loved ones.

If you don't have a valid will and/or living trust, both your loved ones and the legal system may not know how you'd want your assets divided after your death. When this happens, the courts will classify your estate as "intestate" and will distribute your wealth according to certain laws passed by your state's legislature. Leaving your plan up to the laws of your state, instead of taking control of it yourself, can risk leaving nothing to cherished loved ones and also possibly leaving significant portions of your wealth to people that you did not want to receive it.

Should you want to avail yourself to the potentially time, money and stress-saving benefits of avoiding probate, you need to create a plan. There are many options available for avoiding probate, including living trusts, transfer-on-death deeds, pay-on-death accounts and other tools. Without a plan, your wealth must, as mentioned above, be distributed using the rules of intestate estates, which means going through the probate court process.   

If you want to make sure that you are best positioned to avoid (or at least minimize) death taxes, you need to have an estate plan. While the current exemptions values under federal estate tax laws are very high, the numbers when it comes to death taxes under the laws of certain states are less forgiving. Regardless of the state in which you reside, incurring both state and federal death tax obligations can be easier than you think, especially if you are a small business owner or a farmer. Your estate plan allows you utilize all the tools available, including gifting strategies, trusts and insurance products, to put your family in the best position possible.

Additionally, if you have minor children or children with special needs at home, you have extra incentive to plan. With a properly drafted and executed will, you can name the person or people you want to serve as the guardian(s) of your child. If your child has special needs, your plan can include special trust planning elements that will allow you to leave part or all of your wealth to your child with special needs without risking your child's eligibility to continue receiving essential government benefits.

Your planning process can make sure that you have a genuinely complete plan in place. This can include powers of attorney and trust planning that may protect you in the event of incapacity, as well as advance directives to protect your desires in terms of end-of-life planning. 

In addition, this process can be your opportunity to address other planning issues that you may not have even thought about. For instance, do you have a plan to cover your final expenses and the other costs of carrying out your estate planning wishes? If not, you may want to consider the options available to you in terms of life insurance and other insurance products, which can offer important assistance in achieving this goal.



Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Estate Plan Gifting | The Pros and Cons


Summary: Each person's set of estate planning goals can be as unique as the person creating a plan. How you utilize gifts as part of your overall estate planning, or whether you will use them at all, can depend on a wide array of considerations that are a mixture of the legal and the personal. For those that may desire to include gifting in their estate planning, there are many possible benefits that they can realize, but there are downsides as well, if the gifting plan is not carried out carefully.

When people start to consider an estate plan, some approach this prospect with the idea that the best use of their assets is to save those assets during their lifetimes, or use them themselves, and then distribute what remains upon their death. For others, though, the greatest enjoyment of their wealth is derived from giving a portion of it away during their lifetimes. You can realize substantial benefits from using gifting in your estate planning, but it is essential to make sure that the gifting plan you undertake does not entrap you in one or more of the potential pitfalls that exist.    

One of the first things to consider is making sure that your gifting plan doesn't create negative tax consequences. Federal tax law sets the annual gift tax exclusion at $14,000. This means that you can give up to $14,000 to as many people as you want and those are not considered to be taxable gifts for purposes of federal taxes. If you give somebody more than $14,000 in a year, this generally constitutes a taxable gift for federal tax purposes. There are certain exceptions to this, though, like tuition or medical expenses, or gifts to a spouse.

It's important to be aware that you do not have outright give an asset to someone for free for it to qualify as a gift under the federal law. For example, if you sell your SUV that has a fair market value of $40,000 to your daughter for $20,000, the federal tax laws view this as a $20,000 gift to your daughter. This is, of course, more than the $14,000 limit and would be a taxable gift for federal taxes. Another thing that can trigger a "taxable event" is adding someone to your deed. Say, for instance, you decide, as a means of avoiding probate, to alter the deed on your $250,000 home by "adding" your son, making the two of you joint tenants with right of survivorship. In this example, let's also assume that you receive no money from your son for this transaction. One of the consequences of this is that you have, under federal tax rules, made a gift to your son in an amount equal to 1/2 of the value of that home, or $125,000. (There are, of course, potentially less pitfall-filled ways to deal with this home and still avoid probate, such as a revocable living trust or a transfer-on-death deed.)

If you are also planning for Medicaid eligibility, it is vital to be especially careful. While the IRS allows you (as mentioned above) to make as many gifts in a year as you want so long as each one is $14,000 or less, the rules for Medicaid qualification are more strict. Even those gifts that are covered by the federal gift tax exclusion may possibly lead to a period of Medicaid ineligibility (a/k/a a transfer penalty) depending of the specific details of that asset transfer. 

If you want to engage in the gifting of assets as part of your estate planning, be sure to work with an experienced estate planning team, who can help guide you through the process and make sure that your generosity in the present term will not cause you or your loved ones problems in the future.

This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com

This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan


Friday, October 28, 2016

Estate Planning | Protect Your Loved Ones and Express Your Values


Summary: A complete estate plan spans lots of areas. in addition to planning for wealth distribution, a thorough plan will also address issues like planning for incapacity and end-of-life planning, among other things. With a well thought out plan that includes a healthcare power of attorney and an advance directive, you can be sure that your objectives and your values are respected and honored in the way that end-of-life care is provided to you.  

Most everyone associates estate planning with "the distribution of all my assets when I die." While this is an essential objective and a central aspect of any estate plan, but a complete estate does more than that. Your properly structred plan will not only allow you to state your goals regarding your wealth, it will also communicate your desires regarding your end-of-life care.  

Chances are, you have spent a lifetime looking after the well-being of your loved ones. Your end-of-life planning within your estate plan is one more opportunity to do just that. Specifically, the healthcare power of attorney and the advance directive documents in your plan allow you to take control and to express your end-of-life wishes to your loved ones and to your medical care providers. In some states, these declarations are covered in these two separate documents, in other states one document covers both. This document (or documents) can allow you to state the circumstances under which you would like life-extending medical provided or withdrawn, and also allows you designate a person, your "proxy," who holds the authority to make medical decisions for you when you cannot speak for yourself.  

With a complete plan, you can have the peace of mind that comes from knowing that you have communicated your values and your objectives in valid, legal documents. With these clear instructions in place, you can also save your loved ones from having to make potentially heart-wrenching decisions about your care with no input from you. Making these decisions without knowing your preferences can lead to both severe disagreements among family members, as well as the potential of guilt on the part of the person who ultimately becomes the decision-maker. 

Perhaps one of your goals is to avoid being a "burden" to your family. Your plan can make it clear to family and doctors alike the exact criteria under which you desire to continue receiving care, and when you would like that care to be withdrawn. You can also dictate the specifics regarding your care, such as whether or not to continue receiving things like painkillers, hydration or nutrition. On the flip side, perhaps your closely-held personal feelings or religious values dictate that doctors should continue doing everything possible to prolong your life regardless of your condition. For people in this position, a plan can be an important helper, again making sure that loved ones and doctors all know how you would like your care managed.  

When you are experiencing your final illness, it will certainly be an extremely painful time for your loved ones. Nothing is going to stop that pain. However, a complete estate plan with detailed end-of-life planning can at least make things a little easier for your family in a time of great stress.

This article is published by the Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services-company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at www.legacyassuranceplan.com

This article written and published by:
8039 Cooper Creek Blvd
University Park, Florida 34201
844.306.5272 (Phone)
@assuranceplan
#legacyassuranceplan






Click Below To See Other Legacy Assurance Plan Related Sites:

Legacy Assurance Plan on Facebook

Legacy Assurance Plan on Twitter

Legacy Assurance Plan on Blogspot

Legacy Assurance Plan on Google Plus

Legacy Assurance Plan on Pinterest

Legacy Assurance Plan on LinkedIn

Legacy Assurance Plan on Tumblr

Legacy Assurance Plan on Delicious

Legacy Assurance Plan YouTube Channel